Tagged as workers

>How Much For a Worker’s Life?

May 28, 2009

>How much would you guess a worker’s life is worth? Millions? Hundreds of thousands? Maybe you can’t even contemplate a thing like measuring human life in terms of pure monetary value. Maybe, like the credit card commercials say, it’s…priceless?

Or what about $7000?

If that last figure seems a little low to you, you’ll no doubt be horrified to hear that that’s the top rate. The maximum amount that OSHA is allowed to fine companies who’ve received citations subjecting their workers to preventable hazards that could result in death or serious physical harm.

This is the palty price WalMart has to pay after OSHA

cited Wal-Mart Stores Inc. for inadequate crowd management following the Nov. 28, 2008, death of an employee at its Valley Stream, N.Y., store. The worker died of asphyxiation after he was knocked to the ground and trampled by a crowd of about 2,000 shoppers who surged into the store for its annual “Blitz Friday” pre-holiday sales event.

This is what a worker’s life is worth. Less than a fraction of 1 percent of those bonuses paid out to AIG executives.

Doesn’t that reflect a problem with our labor laws? As Jason Lefkowitz at CTW Connect points out:

President Barack Obama has brought in a new team at the Department of Labor that is committed to ensuring that every worker has a safe workplace. But they can only do as much as they are empowered to do by the law. And the laws that govern worker protection on the job are shockingly toothless.

Lefkowitz goes on to make the same ask that I’ll make here: Please tell Congress to pass the Protecting America’s Workers Act, which is currently before the House of Representatives. It’s legislation that would put some teeth in our labor laws and strengthen many protections for employees at their workplaces–including upping the minimum fine for the type of citation WalMart received after their worker’s trampling death.

It won’t bring workers who’ve died on the job back to their families and friends. But it would at least give companies pause to think about the consequences of not adequately protecting workers from on-the-job hazards.

Making workers safer on the job? That really would be priceless.

Uncategorized

>New Study Shows Employers’ Anti-UnionTactics Have Increased

May 22, 2009

>A new study illustrates what workers have known for years–it’s become harder to get a union than ever, thanks to an increase in opposition to unionization by employers.

The study, by Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education research at the Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, is titled “No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing.” The study was

based on a random sample of 1,004 unionization elections from early 1999 to late 2003 and relied on a review of National Labor Relations Board cases and documents, as well as surveys of 562 lead union organizers.

A similar study done 12 years ago found that employers used 10 or more types of anti-union tactics in 26 percent of unionization drives. Bronfenbrenner’s study shows that 10 or more antiunion tactics were used by employers in 49%, or almost half of all organizing efforts. In 12 years, companies have doubled their efforts to oppose unionization among their workers.

The report includes confirmation that there has been an increase in more coercive and retaliatory tactics, such as:

plant closing threats and actual plant closings, discharges, harassment and other discipline, surveillance, and alteration of benefits and conditions.

And it shows that even workers who have the determination and strength to fight through may not be guaranteed a contract, since:

Even for those who do win the election, 52% are still without a contract a year later, and 37% are still without a contract two years after an election.

For most workers who’ve tried to get a union at their workplace, the report simply confirms the bitter truth they’ve been aware of for a long time–and demonstrates the increased importance of passing the Employee Free Choice Act.

When Joanne Fowler, a Certified Nursing Assistant at Lake Village Health Care in Wilmot, Ark.,and her co-workers tried to organize their workplace, management threatened workers with layoffs and tried to bribe workers with raises if they would vote against the union. She said that:

under the Employee Free Choice Act, it will be the workers’ free choice to organize. You won’t have to worry about the company threatening you.

At a briefing today on Capitol Hill to unveil the study, California Rite Aid worker Angel Warner, who is trying to form a union and get a contract with the International Longshore and Warehouse Union spoke out about anti-union tactics and intimidation:

We wanted to form a union so we would be treated with dignity and could speak up without fear of losing our jobs. Now we finally got through the harassment to form a union and we still don’t have a contract. It shouldn’t be like this. If my coworkers and I want a union, we should have one.

Uncategorized

>Artists Support Employee Free Choice (w/video)

May 14, 2009

>Broadway talent, TV stars, movie stars and other artists–forty seven of them–have just released a new video in support of the Employee Free Choice Act. People don’t always realize that most artists are also union members, and that unions are the reason those working in showbiz can support a family and pay the bills.

Check out the great video and be sure to spread the word.