Tagged as unions

RSS

>Another Meme Debunked: Immigrants Not Actually Taking Our Jobs

>
“They’re taking our jobs!” It’s the most common refrain heard in the the narrow dialogue and screaming matches that pass for debate on immigration, on cable news shows and faux-populist rallies alike. It’s the one supposedly irrefutable argument, the one that immigration opponents use to try to stoke the fears and anger of the under or unemployed–especially in this troubled economy.

It’s not a new refrain. It’s been heard throughout our history during periods of immigration of various groups, like the Chinese, to the United States. It’s a dangerous phrase that implies a delicate balance between “us” and the “other,” the immigrant, which “they” are tipping by coming into our country and taking all the jobs. It’s a phrase that cuts off all debate and has even some reasonable, otherwise compassionate people nodding in agreement.

And now we find out it’s not even true. From the Des Moines Register today:

With the Obama administration and Congress expected to push ahead with immigration reform, it’s important that lawmakers and the public shape policy changes based on fact rather than fears.

It has perhaps seemed logical to assume that the willingness of many foreigners – particularly those here illegally – to work for low pay takes jobs away from Americans. But it turns out that having a large number of recent immigrants in a location doesn’t necessarily correlate with a lot of native-born workers being unemployed, based on an analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.

That analysis, done by the Immigration Policy Center, shows that “there is little apparent relationship between recent immigration and unemployment rates at the regional, state, or county level.”

The report shows, for example, that:

Recent immigrants make up 8.4 percent of the population in the Pacific region (California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska and Hawaii), but just 2.8 percent of the population in the East North Central region (Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin). Yet, the regions had similar unemployment rates of 10.8 percent in the Pacific region and 10 percent in the East North Central region as of March 2009.

Another example: In New Jersey, recent immigrants account for 7.3 percent of the population, but in Maine they are just 0.8 percent. Nonetheless, the states’ March unemployment rates respectively were 8.3 and 8.l percent.

The report found the highest unemployment rates are in counties in manufacturing centers and rural areas, which generally draw fewer recent immigrants.

The tradition of blaming job loss on immigrants is one we ought to lose in a hurry. Unemployment is very real problem, but it’s not the fault of immigrants. We need problem-solving, not scapegoating, to fix our economy and implement meaningful immigration reform in this country.

>Not Such Bright Bulbs at Morning Joe

>
A funny thing happened this morning. During a rather lopsided discussion about unions, the folks at Morning Joe pretended to try really, really hard to think of ANY successful unionized companies. But they couldn’t name a single one. They hemmed and hawed and got these strained looks on their faces–but nope. Couldn’t come up with one. Not even the company that owns NBC–GE.

What a bunch of dim bulbs.

After all, almost anyone could probably name at least a few successful unionized companies–companies that not only survive, but thrive with a terrific union workforce. Folks have been suggesting many of these companies to add to Talking Points Memo’s post on the subject.

You can find the growing list here.

UPDATE: Sorkin apologizes. Good on him–but what about Joe, Mika, and Mike?

>Rep. Don Young: Defender of Employee Free Choice?

>Well, well. Representative Don Young (R-Alaska) has come out in defense of the Employee Free Choice Act. And no, you didn’t just read that wrong. As Greg Sargent notes:

GOP Rep Don Young isn’t exactly known for his reluctance to toe the Republican line on key issues. So it’s kind of a big deal that he has openly broken with his colleagues when it comes to their leading talking point against the Employee Free Choice Act: The claim that it would eliminate the “secret ballot” option for joining unions.

The Anchorage Daily News reports that Young made the comments at a gathering of “Alaskans for Liberty” last Thursday. Apparently, after the outspoken Republican was asked about “card check legislation,” Young said this:

I believe in unions. I believe in working people. They say the secret ballot is eliminated. That’s not true. A secret ballot can be requested.

So there you have it, folks. Even Rep. Don Young says the “no secret ballot” argument is bunk.