Food Safety

RSS

New York Times fronts investigative story on E. coli in ground beef

Meatingplace.com

By Rita Jane Gabbett

 The New York Times on Sunday ran on its front page an investigative story about E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef.

The story traced the origins and path through the food chain of beef ground by Cargill in 2007 that was involved in an E. coli outbreak that sickened, among others, 22-year-old Stephanie Smith.

The nearly 5,000-word story also focused on the issue of processors testing ingredients they receive from slaughterhouses before they grind. While USDA has encouraged processors to do so, such testing is not required by law.

The read the entire story, click here.

Grocers Can Gain Favor with Consumers by Supporting Food Safety Reform

The Packer

By Kevin Herglotz

Most consumers today trust their local grocer to deliver quality, wholesome and safe products. Our local stores are part of the community and in the wake of some of the most high profile food safety recalls in our nations history, consumers trust their local stores to protect them should the food safety system fail. However, consumers are nervous about the antiquated system and generally supportive of a major overhaul of the nations food safety laws and regulations.

Without missing a beat, Congress and the Obama administration are ready to act and have a mandate to significantly change the outdated food safety system. Aside from a small group of vocal CEOs, the industry has been relatively silent, failing to engage in a proactive strategy to better position grocers during the debate. There’s more information about what the sector is against, rather than what its for. That’s not a good strategy for success.

Undoubtedly, sweeping changes that will impact the entire food sector from farm to table will become law in the coming year. The silence on such a critical issue that impacts business and resonates so strongly with customers is a miscalculation and missed opportunity. That said, the industry has time to influence the outcome and gain a seat at the negotiating table. To be relevant, there needs to be effective engagement from grocers and trade associations and more collaboration with elected leaders and consumer groups. Here are seven broad policy positions the industry should publicly embrace in launching an effective public and government affairs strategy to influence the debate.

Support an integrated approach to food safety. The current patchwork system is ineffective, duplicative and slow to respond. The lack of effective inter-government agency coordination puts consumers at risk and creates confusion, diminished government credibility and wasted resources. There should be a consolidated approach dedicated to food safety that integrates current authorities and resources.

Overhaul the nations food safety inspection system. More public and private inspectors are needed, but stronger checks and balances with independent verification are also needed. Inspection systems should be integrated, risk-based and focused on critical points. The government should double its funding for scientific research to spark more innovation and new technologies.

Raise the standards for imports. Stronger food import verification and inspections are needed to ensure products entering the country are safe and wholesome. This shouldn’t be a tool toward protectionism, but rather a move to strengthen the system to ensure domestic standards are met by international producers. Embrace mandatory recall authority. Its time to officially give the government what it already technically has. However, government agencies can use flawed best guess approaches to determining potential contamination. As we saw with the tomato recall last year, this can lead to more harm than good. Appropriate checks and balances to ensure accuracy and integrity of the system are also needed.

Create a public-private commission to examine weaknesses and mitigate risks. The current food safety regulatory system is a complicated, multi-year process riddled with delays that often result in outdated, ineffective rules that don’t prevent risk. A commission, modeled after the successful California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement, would provide an independent voice with the ability to make changes based on the highest risks and eliminating potential hazards. It would also expand agriculture and food manufacturing best-practice agreements to improve industry food safety standards.

Strengthen traceability and animal identification systems. Consumers want to know the origin of their food and regulators need tools to trace back products when necessary. Unfortunately, the country of origin issue tainted the debate. Politicians pushed COOL for protectionist reasons, resulting in a regulatory scheme that is confusing and misguided. Much like nutritional labeling, there needs to be consistency across the board for labeling, identification and traceability.

Adopt better methods of communication. A one-stop recall information center should be created with consistent protocols and consumer information. Retailers should embrace new ways to inform customers on these issues, such as the use of technologies that can alert checkers when a recalled product is scanned. A new public-private consumer education program about food safety, including prevention and safe handling practices, needs to be established.

The time is now for the grocery industry to proactively engage in the public debate on food safety reform and gain the upper hand in the public policy discussion with customers and elected officials.

Flu Prompts Daily Damage Control

The Washington Post

By Philip Rucker

It was Day 7 of the great swine flu outbreak, and inside the eighth-floor conference room in a concrete hulk of an office building on Capitol Hill, the pork lobbyists were in crisis mode. The National Pork Producers Council, whose members were watching with dismay as hog prices fell, labored to reverse the public dialogue about the fast-spreading virus and to convince consumers that the “other white meat” was still safe to eat.

Pigs can be consumed, the lobbyists insisted; they can even be petted and hugged, or tickled until they squeal. But pork cannot be blamed for the pandemonium gripping the globe. The culprit, evidently, is H1N1, a strain of the flu virus. If only folks could remember that, the lobbyists said.

For going on two weeks, the Washington professionals who represent the nation’s 67,000 pork producers have been in a mad dash to, as President Obama once said, put lipstick on this pig. Hundreds of people have been infected in more than a dozen countries, prompting the closure of scores of schools across the United States, including four in the Washington region.

In Canada over the weekend, officials said a farmworker passed the virus to a herd of hogs. Although the farmer and the pigs apparently have recovered, and top U.S. and Mexican officials yesterday projected a cautious optimism that the new virus is not as lethal as initially feared, intense worldwide focus on swine flu shows no signs of abating.

Each morning, the pork lobbyists assemble to figure out how bad it got overnight. On this day last week, word came that officials in Egypt had ordered the slaughter of every pig in sight — about 300,000 of them. In Iowa, the first two possible cases of swine flu were reported, and the Russians and Chinese were considering banning pork imports from that Midwestern state, America’s biggest hog producer. On CNN, a news anchor teased an upcoming flu segment with footage of dead pigs.

“Worried about the swine flu?” the anchor asked. “Well, it could be worse. You could be a pig farmer.”

Or someone whose job it is to represent them.

Everywhere, everyone was calling it swine flu, and at the pork producers council, there was a battle underway to change that. The new day began with fresh coffee at the long mahogany conference table in a room so staid, illuminated by fluorescent lights and with the air conditioner humming along, one would never know it was ground zero for the pork industry — save for the bronze pig statue resting on the windowsill, beside an American flag.

Lobbyist Kirk Ferrell led his team in what he called “policy triage.” There were conference calls with crisis communications consultants to develop messaging for advertisements, dozens of reporters to spin, pork industry titans in Des Moines seeking updates, negotiations with U.S. trade officials over international exports.

Ferrell shared the latest statistic: Hog prices had dropped by $5 a head since the first reports of swine flu surfaced April 24.

“This thing has speeded up,” he said. “We’re still trying to get a feel for what’s happening in the meat case.” But, he added, “This is a free-for-all, and we’ve all got to go to work.”

Still, Ferrell, a 20-year veteran pork lobbyist, appeared relaxed, leaning back in his executive chair.

Right up until, moments later, a blustering Nicholas Giordano, the lobby’s international trade specialist, burst in, turned to communications director Dave Warner and said: “Hey, media boy, did you know there were only 100 reported cases in Mexico? This is a [expletive] normal flu!”

Giordano said several countries were restricting imports of U.S. pork. The lobbyists thought they had Honduras on their side, and the country was planning to lift its restrictions.

“But now we don’t know,” Giordano said.

“They’re not following the science,” Warner lamented. “It’s a respiratory illness. It’s not a food illness.”

“There’s no evidence that it’s in the U.S. pig population,” asserted Jennifer Greiner, the lobby’s in-house swine veterinarian, who moonlights as a TV spokeswoman for pork.

Ferrell noted: “Pork is the meat of choice around the world. Forty-four percent of people globally eat pork.

“We need to communicate to our foreign markets that we’re still open for business,” he added.

Ferrell asked a staff member about a letter the lobby had drafted, for members of Congress to sign, urging Obama to protect U.S. pork exports.

The signatures should be ready soon, lobbyist Audrey Adamson said.

“It’s all about courage,” Ferrell told her, “getting Obama to be vigilant with keeping the markets open.”

Oh, he added, make sure members of Congress have their “one-minutes”: short, ready-made statements about the safety of pork products. “They’ve got to have their talking points,” he said.

Soon the team was in talks with a crisis communications firm to develop an ad campaign to convince people that pork is safe to eat. Ferrell took notes as the messaging gurus outlined their options: focus on opinion-makers inside the Beltway with high-frequency ads in Capitol Hill papers. Or go for a more expensive national audience.

Better yet — what about staging a photo-op in which Obama would serve pork at the White House? Maybe D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty could take Obama out for lunch at a local barbecue joint, the White House press corps in tow.

When the discussion ended, the lobbyists wondered whether Obama even likes pork.

“We don’t know,” Adamson said.

“He’s not Muslim,” Warner said. “We know that.”

Regardless, the president and his administration seem to have gotten the message. As of Tuesday, federal officials had stopped saying “swine flu,” instead referring to the virus strain by a more scientific name: H1N1. The name may be technical and confusing, but it’s also blessedly swine-free.

Ferrell’s shop is in near-constant contact with political officials at the Agriculture Department and at Obama’s trade office. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack — a former governor of Iowa and longtime friend of the pork industry — stood at the North Lawn of the White House to face television cameras. “Pork is safe to eat in this country,” he assured cable news viewers, even noting in one interview that he had eaten pork for breakfast and lunch that day.

But the government’s turnabout may not be enough. The news media has stuck with its swine flu designation. Even one of Ferrell’s pork lobbyists, Adamson, goofed the other day at a breakfast fundraiser for Rep. Tim Holden (D-Pa.), a top member of the Agriculture Committee. “I slipped and called it ‘swine,’ ” she confessed. H1N1 “doesn’t really roll off the tongue.”

The lobbyists scurried to their offices — no time even for a ham sandwich. Everywhere in their offices were pigs. Piggy banks and pig statues. Pink pigs and black-and-white pigs. Brass pig bookends and blue-and-pink pig stocking hats. Plastic pigs, wooden pigs and stuffed pigs.

Ferrell poked into Warner’s office.

“Anything new?” he asked.

“The World Health Organization just named it ‘influenza A,’ ” Warner informed him.