August, 2012

Labor Day Should Serve as Reminder of Why We Need Unions

A recent post from Ullico, Inc. CEO Edward M. Smith on the Huffington Post caught our attention this week. Titled Unions Matter More than Ever, the piece focuses on the GOP-driven trope that “unions don’t matter anymore.”

As Smith argues, the troubling events that have been used to support this claim - the Wisconsin recall, right-to-work laws, and declining union membership - should only mean one thing: that unions are more important than ever.

In the months leading up to this November’s election, talk of the shrinking middle class has been repeated over and over again.  Is it any wonder that the decline of the middle class coincides with shrinking labor unions? We need unions to keep the middle class strong, and alive.

Smith even cites a study published last year in the American Sociological Review by Bruce Western of Harvard University and Jake Rosenfeld of the University of Washington that found found “between a fifth to a third of the growth in inequality can be explained by the decline of unions.”

With more Americans out of work, without healthcare, and no means to save for retirement, are we willing to sit back and simply say that, because times are challenging, that unions don’t matter anymore?

No. We cannot afford to.

Unions ensure that there are jobs that will provide workers good salaries, pensions, healthcare, and other benefits.  Union jobs allow people to make living wages, send their children to college or trade schools, and have economic security.  Unions are good for everyone, as they allow people to invest in their communities, and have hope of achieving an American Dream.

If we give up on unions, who will speak for the working people? Corporations will, but you can bet their voices will not actually advocate for the middle class, average American, struggling to make ends meet.

Smith also brings up a good point about politics.  He reminds us that “in order for unions to remain strong, we must remain united at the ballot box.” Rather than letting our opponents divide us politically, we need to support each other- our common interests and goals. Without this, we risk losing our right to collective bargaining.  How else can we achieve fair pay and benefits?

Unions are about sticking together, and having a united voice to achieve fairness and equality.  So if we do not stick together, then of course unions won’t work. In the decades past, unions were instrumental in gaining rights for working America.  Without unions, there would be no minimum wage, no safety standards on the job, no job security.  Unions achieved these things by staying strong and standing together, and together, we can continue to help provide good jobs.

Fighting Fire with Food and Support

In July of 2009, a terrible fire broke out at the Patrick Cudahy meatpacking plant in Milwaukee, WI. The massive Smithfield plant was completely consumed by the fire, threatening lives, costing millions of dollars in damage, and displacing over 1,400 workers, leaving them without work.

The devastating fire at the Patrick Cudahy plant prompted UFCW Local 1473 to immediately reach out across the labor community.  The Patrick Cudahy Worker Relief Fund was formed, and generous donations were made.  Local 1473 members then worked with the the Milwaukee County Labor Council and the Hunger Task Force to establish a food bank specifically for the Patrick Cudahy workers.  The Hunger Task Force, which, prior to the fire had relied on the Patrick Cudahy plant to supply many of the products in their food bank, was now helping to feed the displaced workers.

With the support of the Hunger Task force and other organizations, members were able to stick together and move toward recovering from the fire. Three years later, members are back at the plant to continue their work and support for organizations like the Hunger Task Force that play such an important role in their communities.

Last week, members from UFCW Local 1473 again joined partners Smithfield, Patrick Cudahy, and Pick ‘n Save in the latest event for the Feeding the Hungry campaign. The 40,000 pound donation went to the Hunger Task Force in Milwaukee, WI. Some of the members of Local 1473 still work at the nearby Patrick Cudahy meat processing plant, continuing to help produce products such as hams and bacon, which were part of the donation to the Hunger Task Force. This latest Feeding the Hungry donation exhibited the special and continued relationship members share with the Hunger Task Force.

Local 1473′s story is a powerful reminder that even in times of disaster, when people stick together, there is always hope.

The UFCW is committed to ensuring that families across the country have the relief and the opportunities they need to weather the current economic crises. As the foodworkers’ union, with members working in grocery stores, packing plants, and food processing plants, UFCW members and locals have long been involved in programs to help the hungry and provide for those in need. One of the most successful, and certainly the largest, of these programs is the joint UFCW/Smithfield Feeding the Hungry (FTH) Program – a three-year, multi-city, coast to coast effort to donate and deliver more than 20 million servings of protein to food banks through Feeding America’s network.

All across the country UFCW members are on the frontlines of efforts to improve and strengthen their communities, and this partnership reflects their unwavering commitment to protect and advocate for families during tough times. This partnership is about bringing together organizations with the resources, the relationships and the know-how to ensure that vulnerable communities across the country have access to well-supplied food banks. Our goal is simple: Get good, nutritious food to as many families, in as many communities, as possible.

What Will Romney do for…National Security?

credit: political junkie

President Obama’s foreign policy plan could not differ more from Mitt Romney’s.

Mitt Romney espouses a “go it alone” foreign policy vision. He has articulated a more aggressive approach to the use of military force and given indications he would have continued the war in Iraq while not drawing down in Afghanistan. Gov. Romney has voiced a desire to return to the days of the Cold War, declaring Russia to be America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” while at the same time threatening a trade war with China. In all, Gov. Romney’s stated foreign policy vision amounts to a return to the Bush-Cheney foreign policy of 2001 to 2005.

The following elements of Romney’s foreign policy plan would be detrimental to our country:


  • Gov. Romney’s rhetoric indicates he would be more willing to use large-scale force in a wider number of places than President Obama.
  • Gov. Romney views China as a zero-sum competitor for global dominance, and the overall thrust of his China policy is military containment of an expansionist and coercive China.
  • Gov. Romney does not appear to have clear positions for the global economic crisis. His major international economic policy proposal is a super-sized free-trade zone named after President Ronald Reagan that appears to duplicate many of the functions of existing institutions like the World Trade Organization.
  • Gov. Romney views Russia through Cold War lenses, where Moscow is America’s “number one geopolitical foe” and any efforts to establish a working relationship with it are appeasement by definition and demonstrate weakness.
  • He would have kept 10,000–30,000 U.S. troops in Iraq for an unspecified period of time following the conclusion of the 2008 U.S.-Iraq security agreement at the end of 2011.
  • He takes a rhetorical hardline by threatening war if Iran does not give in to U.S. demands on its nuclear program.  
  • He would abandon decades of U.S. policy of aiming to broker peace efforts between Israel, the Palestinians, and Arab states.

Additionally, Gov. Romney’s defense plans would be prohibitively expensive. He has pledged to set the Pentagon base budget (not counting war funding) “at a floor of 4 percent of GDP,” which would result in at least $2.1 trillion in added spending over the next decade compared to the Department of Defense’s current plan. Gov. Romney has not elaborated on what specific threats prompt him to call for this huge increase in defense spending. 

 
America needs to pay close attention to the specific plans Romney has in mind for our country if he were to win the 2012 election. The facts show that President Obama’s actions while in office, as well as his plans for the future, are what’s best for working families and middle class America.