December, 2011

UFCW Members at A&P and Pathmark Approve Deal

from NJ.com

New Jersey union workers at Pathmark and A&P voted to cut their compensation in a deal that is meant to save their bankrupt employer, supermarket giant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea operates more than 100 stores in New Jersey under the names A&P, Pathmark, Super Fresh and Food Basics, with more than 13,000 workers in the state.

Members at more than a dozen local chapters of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union voted on the deal Sunday, Monday and yesterday, approving it by a vote of 7,200-1,827.

The union members accepted a wage cut of about 3 percent, according to UFCW local 464A President John Niccollai.

“In the area of wages, I would urge our members to view this issue in the context of the adage: ‘Is the glass half empty or half full,’” said Niccollai in a message to his members. “In our case, with reference to wages, the glass is 97% full – a significant victory.”

The union also kept its health care plan free of a co-pay, Niccollai said.

Niccollai acknowledged that some members of his union didn’t like the deal, which gave up a week of vacation and some sick and personal days, but he said it was necessary for the company to get $490 million of debt and equity financing from private investors.

“We all understood, the company, the unions, the members that unless we combined our efforts to provide an infusion of capital, the company would not be able to continue,” Niccollai said. “The financing they obtained from Goldman Sachs and others was conditioned on both suppliers and the unions making accommodations.”

Statement from UFCW International President Joe Hansen on NLRB Election Rule

(Washington, D.C.) — Joe Hansen, International President of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Union, today released the following statement after the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) took a step toward approving a final rule to modernize the union election process and House Republicans passed legislation to block that rule.

“”The NLRBs proposed rule to streamline the vote for union representation would be a modest but important first step toward fixing a broken process that favors CEOs over workers. Justice delayed is justice denied, and that is too often the case for workers that file a union election petition. Many employers delay, delay, and delay some more through frivolous litigation and other procedural tactics. They use this time to intimidate, harass, and in some cases fire pro-union employees. The result is an unfair election or no election at all. This proposed rule would ensure that when a majority of workers want to have a voice on the job, they will be able to do so, free of interference.

“”With the rule not even finalized, House Republicans have continued their assault on workers by passing legislation to block it. It is the latest act by a party more committed to denying the rights of workers to stick together than fixing the economy and creating jobs. Like the rest of the extreme anti-worker measures passed by the House, we expect this one will be given a quick death in the Senate.

“Union contracts offer the best opportunity for stable, middle-class jobs. The NLRB is charged with protecting the right of every American to bargain for a better life. This proposed rule would do just that. It should be adopted.”"