2011

Kroger Workers in Mid-Michigan Ratify New Contract

Michigan Kroger workers represented by the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), Local 951 voted on Tuesday to approve a new three-year contract by a vote of 84 percent “yes” to 16 percent “no.”

“The proposal had the full recommendation of the bargaining committee as it preserved members’ health benefits and pension, and provided top rate wage increases, which was a significant accomplishment given Michigan’s challenging economy and high unemployment rate,” Marv Russow, UFCW Local 951’s president, said. “The committee felt this was the best contract possible under these circumstances. By their overwhelming ratification of the contract, I would say the membership agreed.”In November, Kroger members rejected the company’s first contract offer and authorized a strike. They had been working under a contract extension on the previous contract. “The last month has been stressful for Kroger members as there was a great deal of uncertainty about the future,” Russow said. “With the ratification of the new contract, they will have peace of mind and security for the next three years. Hopefully, the economy will turn around by 2014 and we can enter contract bargaining under improved circumstances.”

The UFCW 951 Kroger contract covers approximately 1,000 workers at 11 stores in greater Lansing, Jackson, and Mt. Pleasant. Headquartered in Grand Rapids, MI, UFCW Local 951 represents over 28,500 workers across Michigan in a variety of industries including retail food, food processing, nursing home, and retail drug, employed at several companies including Meijer, Kroger, Rite Aid, Plumb’s, Polly’s, and Harding’s.

 

The New Blue Collar: Temporary Work, Lasting Poverty And The American Warehouse

JOLIET, Ill., and FONTANA, Calif. — Like nearly everyone else in Joliet without good job prospects, Uylonda Dickerson eventually found herself at the warehouses looking for work.

“I just needed a job,” the 38-year-old single mother says.

Dickerson came to the right place. Over the past decade and a half, Joliet and its Will County environs southwest of Chicago have grown into one of the world’s largest inland ports, a major hub for dry goods destined for retail stores throughout the Midwest and beyond. With all the new distribution centers have come thousands of jobs at “logistics” companies — firms that specialize in moving goods for retailers and manufacturers. Many of these jobs are filled by Joliet’s African Americans, like Dickerson, and immigrants from Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America.

But many bottom-rung workers like Dickerson don’t work for the big corporations whose products are in the warehouses, or even the logistics companies that run them. They go to work for labor agencies that supply workers like Dickerson. Last year, she found work as a temp through one of the myriad staffing agencies that serve big-box retailers and their contractors. Thanks largely to the warehousing boom, Will County has developed one of the highest concentrations of temp agencies in the Midwest.

Dickerson, grateful to have even a temp job, was taken on as a “lumper” — someone who schleps boxes to and from trailers all day long. As unglamorous as her duties were, Dickerson became an essential cog in one of the most sophisticated machines in modern commerce — the Walmart supply chain. Walmart, the world’s largest private-sector employer, had contracted a company called Schneider Logistics to operate the warehouse. And Schneider, in turn, had its own contracts with staffing companies that supplied workers.

The experience would change the way Dickerson saw the retail industry — particularly during the frenetic run-up to the holidays, when workers are under tremendous pressure to get products out the door and into stores.

“I don’t think people know what the people in those warehouses have to go through to get them their stuff in those stores,” Dickerson says. “If you don’t work in a warehouse, you don’t know.”

Dickerson quickly discovered that the work wasn’t easy, if there was any work at all. Each morning she showed up at her warehouse, she wasn’t sure whether she’d be assigned a trailer and earn a day’s pay. She says there were days that she and many temps were told simply to go home, without pay, since there wasn’t as much product to unload as expected. Sometimes Dickerson was told they didn’t have any trailers light enough for a woman, she says.

But on most days the warehouse teemed with lumpers, many of them wearing different colored t-shirts to signify the different agencies they worked for. Dickerson herself would work for two different labor providers within the same warehouse in a little more than a year.

The difficulty of a lumper’s day often went according to chance. A lucky lumper might be assigned a container filled with boxes of Kleenex or stuffed animals, while an unlucky lumper might pull a container filled with kiddie swimming pools or 200-pound trampolines. For the heaviest lifts, Dickerson would be assigned a partner, and the two would split the pay for the trailer, moving the massive boxes onto pallets by hand.

The job was fast-paced and stressful. Dickerson says supervisors would walk along the warehouse’s bay doors, marking the workers’ progress over time. The supervisors, Dickerson and other workers say, often told them to speed it up if they wanted to be invited back. Many of the workers were temps with no job security and no recourse. And the local unemployment rate, then around 11 percent, promised a long line of potential replacements.

“By the end of the day, your body hurts so bad,” says Dickerson, who was among a small minority of females working as lumpers at the warehouse. “You tell them you can’t do it the next day, … they’ll tell you, ‘We’ve got four more people waiting for your job.'”

For a while, Dickerson worked according to “piece rate” — she was paid not by the hour but by the trailer — a stressful pay scheme meant to encourage her and her colleagues to work faster and faster, and one that the labor movement worked hard to abolish in many industries in the 20th century. Each paycheck was different than the last, and most of them were disappointingly low, she says. In her year at the warehouse, Dickerson says she never had health benefits, sick days or vacation days. If she didn’t unload containers, she didn’t get paid.

“It all depends on how fast you work,” she says. “It’s like a race. You’re racing to get done with the trailer so you can get another one. Otherwise, you won’t get enough money.”

The warehouse floor wasn’t a very welcoming place for a woman, Dickerson says. As one of the relatively few female lumpers, she says she was often fending off crude overtures from male co-workers. And then there were the bathroom issues. While it was piece rate when it benefited the boss, the clock came on for break time. Each day Dickerson had two 15-minute personal breaks in addition to her lunch, but the warehouse was so sprawling — it covered ground equal to several football fields — that it could take her five minutes to walk each way to get some air or use the bathroom, leaving her with only five minutes of personal time.

“When I used to go to the bathroom, I literally had somebody counting down the minutes,” Dickerson says.

It was particularly difficult when she was on her period and she felt couldn’t use the restroom when she needed to. Eventually, she was being reprimanded for too many breaks, she says. Worried about losing her job, she says she tried so hard to avoid using the bathroom that she eventually developed a bladder infection.

Physically and emotionally drained, Dickerson stopped showing up at the warehouse earlier this year.

“My body still is not the same,” she says. “I still have aches and I still have pains. I have migraines because of the stress I went through working at that place.”

Dickerson says she’s now living in a house where the electricity and water have been shut off, sharing a cell phone with some of her neighbors. She’s on government-sponsored health care, just as she was while working at the warehouse, and she now relies on food stamps to get by.

The one place she refuses to take her food stamps is Walmart.

* * * * *

Walmart may have been the end beneficiary of Dickerson’s sweat, but the big-box retailer wasn’t directly responsible for her low pay or her aching body. That’s one of the many benefits to an employment arrangement based on outsourcing and subcontracting: The corporation at the top indemnifies itself from any unpleasantness at the bottom, thanks to the smaller corporate players in the middle. Many American companies have woken up to this fact, with broad implications for the future of blue-collar work.

“It seems to be spreading like wildfire,” Nelson Lichtenstein, a professor of American labor history at the University of California, Santa Barbara, says of such outsourcing, particularly as it relates to temp workers like Dickerson. “All of these companies, wherever they possibly can, they want to create a workforce that doesn’t work for them. The question is, Why? What is the incentive?”

“They’re smart,” he says. “They run the numbers.”

>>> Read the Full Article

How Pathmark and A&P stole Christmas

 by Kasey Schefflin-Emrich, Chronicle Contributor

The fictional character of the Grinch is appearing in the form of a real-life supermarket chain, according to New York State’s largest grocery workers union.

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1500 is protesting the decision by A&P/Pathmark to open its stores on Christmas Day, calling the move Grinch-like.

In a letter to company executives, union leaders cited the retailer’s ongoing financial difficulties with its bankruptcy filing and urged “that as this very difficult year draws to a close, now more than ever we should respect and welcome a day off for reflection and uninterrupted time with friends and family.”

The union expressed how the company’s decision to remain open, while other supermarkets such as Stop and Shop, King Kullen, and Shop Rite have agreed to close that day, shows a lack of caring for its employees.

“Now is no time for A&P/Pathmark management to play the role of the Grinch,” said Anthony Speelman, the secretary treasurer of the Westbury-based union representing 23,000 grocery workers in Long Island, the five boroughs, Westchester, Putnam and Duchess counties. “Their employees have suffered through store closings, uncertainty and lost wages. Asking our members to work on Christmas Day shows a stunning lack of compassion and another example of this ‘War on Christmas’ we seem to read about each day.”

Speelman thinks the action is even worse than anything the protagonist in the popular Dr. Seuss children’s book would do.

“Even the Grinch would be shocked by A&P/Pathmarks’ decision and would question if they had any heart at all,” Speelman said.

Many of the customers shopping at the Pathmark on Atlantic Avenue in Ozone Park, echoed the same sentiment.

“It’s very bad especially for employees with kids who have to run to work and back home,” said Gloria Froelach, a former employee at Pathmark 13 years ago. She was surprised the store was open on Christmas, noting that when she worked there they had the day off.

Yohanny Hernandez, a frequent shopper at the store, thinks the employees should be able to spend time with their loved ones on the holiday.

“They should be allowed to enjoy time with their family,” he said. “Without a doubt it should be closed.”

A person that is no stranger to retail, Meagan Harding, expressed her disappoinment with the store remaining open.

“It’s not right,” said Harding, who has worked at Daffy’s, a designer discount store, for three years. “It’s a waste of electricity and people’s time.”

A&P/Pathmark doesn’t feel this way.

According to a company statement, it “is committed to being the store of the neighborhood and serving the needs of our diverse customer base. Therefore, we have made the decision to open some of our store locations with limited hours on Christmas Day. The company plans to staff the stores with associates who wish to earn additional income by volunteering to work on December 25th.”